Monday, April 13, 2009

Sugar Rush: Myth or Reality?


I've always subscribed to the belief that eating too much sugar will indeed cause a sugar rush ...a high, if you will, or a surge of crazy energy followed by a debilitating crash. That may sound a bit dramatic but I've been affected by this my entire life ...or have I?

While on the phone with my cousin this morning, talking about the affects of sugar on children, she brought up a conversation she had with some mutual friends of ours a couple weeks ago who informed her that studies had been done to prove the sugar rush theory is just a myth.

WHAAAAAAAAAAAT!?!?!?!??!?!??!

...was my first reaction ...and hers as well but she told me that she read some of the studies proving it to be a myth and there weren't really any against it.



Thoughts of young girls drinking Shirly Temples thinking they were Cosmopolitans and "acting" drunk because of it pierced my brain. Is it really just a placebo affect? Have I been faking sugar highs since I was four years old?




Feeling like an absolute fool, I had to do some research of my own to prove my theory but did indeed find more than one article/study on the affects of sugar and the myth of the sugar high.

The Journal of the American Medical Association ran a survey of 23 comparatively rigorous studies conducted between 1982 and 1994 where children were given food or drinks containing a known quantity of sugar or artificial sweetener as a placebo and their behavior was observed and tested afterward. The tests were double blinded: neither the children, parents nor the researchers knew which children were getting the sugar and which were getting the placebo.



Their Findings:

“The meta-analytic synthesis of the studies to date found that sugar does not affect the behavior or cognitive performance of children. The strong belief of parents may be due to expectancy and common association. However, a small effect of sugar or effects on subsets of children cannot be ruled out.”



Another study done by the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology in 1994 by Daniel Hoover and Richard Milich, where they tested 31 boys ages five to seven and their mothers, all of whom had described their offspring as being "behaviorally affected by sugar" produced similar results.

This study also used "artificial sweetener" as a placebo but told half of the mothers that they were given the "real thing" instead. In reality, all the kids had the placebo but...

"the moms who thought they were in the sugar group said their sons acted more hyper. In addition, they tended to hover over their children more during play, offer more criticism of their behavior, etc. The mother-son pairs in the other group were judged by observers to be getting along better. What's more, those moms who, going into the experiment, most strongly believed their kids were sugar-sensitive also scored highest on a test designed to gauge cognitive rigidity."



What I'm not too sure of is how an "artificial sweetener" (aspartame) is a placebo? Shouldn't they have tested sugar against no sugar at all? Or simple sugars from fruit tested against corn syrup or high fructose corn syrup used in processed foods like, let's just say store-bought birthday cake?

While I want to believe that it is a myth {even though it feels like I was just told there was no Santa or God}, I'm not sure that all the tests were definitive. They didn't take into consideration many other variables that I feel, should have been included, for instance, I never really reach for sugary hard candy, it's always chocolate for me. So maybe it's the caffeine in the chocolate giving me the "rush" I am feeling. I didn't read any studies that mentioned that.

Then again, maybe I have an impaired glucose tolerance which is why I feel particularly sensitive to sugar . . . or maybe it's just my mother's persuasiveness inducing a sugar high placebo affect ...still, at 32 years of age?


So moms, what are your thoughts? How were your kids yesterday after finding their Easter baskets? ...and non-moms, how do you feel after eating sugar? How do you feel after reading this? ...because I may still be on the fence.



Sources: The Straight Dope, WikiAnswers, Rationalmoms.com, The Journal of the American Medical Association


27 comments:

K.Line said...

M: I've read so many plausible scientific studies to the contrary - I think you can support any argument but this one is, IMO, patently false. I've had low blood sugar my whole life - when I eat sugar (unbolstered by fat or protein) I go nuts. So does my kid. Certainly, not everyone is affected as extremely, but I know (because I've experimented on myself and my kid) how sugar impacts the body. There is a super high, followed by a depressive low. It's bad. So much metabolic syndrome / hyperinsulemia (precursor to diabetes 2) is the result of sugar abuse. And overuse of "food" with absolutely no nutritional value.

Obvs I feel strongly about this.

Read Good Calories Bad Calories by Gary Taubes. It's a brutal read, but worth it.

...love Maegan said...

I mean, ME TOO ...even after I told my husband of the theory he said "NO WAY!!! I HAVE SEEN YOU LOSE IT AFTER EATING SUGAR!!!"

lol. ...reading the article you linked now

Mrs. D said...

I think the sugar rush is real for kids, but I don't notice a "high" when I eat a lot of candy or something. Sure, it tastes good, and satisfies a craving, but I don't get a rush of energy. Maybe it only affects kids and skinny people. ?

Hilary Baumann said...

Non-mom here: I think sugar has some effect on the body but so does aspartame and other artificial sweeteners. Even artificial food colorings can have an effect (they're starting to notice a correlation with ADHD.)

Regarding placebo affect in the studies - it doesn't sound like they told them that they were NOT given sugar which would have probably given a better read on what happens on a physical level.

I've reduced my sugar intake (not gotten rid of it yet) and things like candy bars now seem sickly sweet to me. I would guess that how much sugar a child typically consumes could desensitize them to the effects as well which was probably not considered.

It sounds like the sugar manufacturers were trying to prove that sugar wasn't bad sort of like the HFCS folks claiming corn syrup as "natural". Natural is an unregulated marketing term by the way.

If you try and cut out the following you'll start to see how much of the standard American diet is made up of the following things:
- High Fructose Corn Syrup
- Hydrogenated Oils (aka - shortening... it has a couple of other names)
- Bleached processed wheat flour
- Unfermented Soy
- Sugar (beet sugar, cane sugar ... there are actually a lot of different kinds of sugar but HFCS is used predominantly.)
- Sugar substitutes - aspartame, splenda, and now "truvia" and "purevia" (more chemical versions of a natural substance so coke and pepsi could make money off the patent. Stevia is the real thing.)

Good alternative sweeteners for the average person (someone with diabetes should do more research before trying any of these):
- Maple syrup (lower glycemic index.. be sure it's real maple, most pancake syrups are simply HFCS)
- Agave syrup (again lower g.i.)
- Honey (higher than agave and maple if I recall correctly but still better than most)
- Xylitol (typically made from the fiber of a birch tree but it has other sources - calorie free)
- Stevia (made from the leaf of a plant ... the best way to describe it is think mint leaves but without the mintyness. Also calorie free.)

I keep meaning to do a chart from good to bad but "good" is slightly subjective.

Too much of any one thing is never good for you.

On top of that you have each individual person and how their body handles certain things. I have certain allergies to foods that I know not everyone has. The strange and worst one is bananas which I finally figured out has something to do with starch. Both the process of cooking and over-aging a banana converts starch to a type of sugar that I can eat without pain.

Some people who are allergic to bananas are allergic for a different reason, the banana plant is in the same family as the latex tree. If you have a latex allergy you are more likely to be allegic to bananas as well.

Got to stop this comment somewhere ... food is just one of those things I've been researching a lot these last couple of years. I kinda get on a role when I start talking about any of it. Sorry if I bored anyone!

LiLu said...

I'm no mom, but as a longtime babysitter growing up, I'm not buying this study AT ALL. Who hasn't witnessed a purple-mouthed kid after 14 pixie sticks on November 1st going batshit crazy in a restaurant or Walmart? Come on now.

drollgirl said...

this is BONKERS. if i have a soda (which has caffeine and sugar) i feel like i am high and about to jump out of my skin. i think it is real? or maybe i am crazy.

...love Maegan said...

I just had some Chocolate Hagen Daz ..not even that much really , and I am a SPEEEEED TYPER right now ...so, yeah. I'm still not convinced this is a myth!!!!

..although, I may be SUPER SENSITIVE.

...love Maegan said...

...and there's the caffeine to consider as well ...eeeeeeeek.

Teresa said...

fabulous post... as a self-proclaimed sugar addict, i'm going to have to look into this.

Savvy Mode SG said...

hm... i can see my niece and her friends acting pretty wild after consuming cupcakes and chocolates. but then... maybe they are just acting like 6 year old....

Meghan said...

I'm going to choose to ignore this post cause sugar is the crack cocaine that fuels me through the work day. Period.

Char said...

I don't have so much the rush but the slump two hours after. boo

Hanako66 said...

I have majorly cut down on my soda intake and am a candy machine, but have never noticed much of a difference in me personally...maybe a bit of the shakes if I haven't eaten all day, but not much. It could just be me though...

TeeTee said...

When I eat too much candy, I actually get tired, and sick. Then it follows with a massive migraine.

Definitely not a sugar high.

Franco said...

sugas is def. the reason why I'm still living today, can't function without it.

abster said...

i love this blog

Maggie May said...

I think it's like most things= it totally depends on your constitution. From purely observational experience, I'd say most people have some adverse reaction to 'too much' sugar, the most common being headache, fatigue, etc. Sugar is something I try to definitely moderate, because it's highly implicated in many things that go wrong with our bodies, not only diabetes but cancer also.

J-Diggety said...

Interesting... I don't get sugar highs, despite the fact that I eat more than I probably should - but a gal with a bad sweet tooth can't help it! However, if I eat too much without balancing it with other foods I spike and then crash. Crashing sucks - sleepy, headachey, the works.
If I ate entire bag of spiced gum drops (my equivalent of your peanut m&m's), I'd be sick to my stomach. But they're SO delicious, its hard to put the bag away! ;)
J

Nicole Marie said...

i think it depends on the person. I can eat a tub of ice cream and go right to sleep but if i even have a sip of caffeine i'm wired and shaky for hours!

being red said...

i've actually heard this!! myth all the way. it's def all mental, i think.

Saskia said...

This has surprised me as I get sugar rushes... chocolate & sweets get me through my days at my desk!

Maybe it's more to do with the artificial additives than the sugar though...

Saskia x

Jazzy said...

As the mom of a VERY, VERY active 4 yr. old., I can say that this is so true. He does not get sugar highs. He gets tired & sleepy after sugar. Think about it, no child would ever get a sweet cookie and glass of milk for dessert before bed if the sugar made them hyper. They wouldn't be able to go to sleep!

I don't get sugar highs either, I get insane migraines if I don't balance the sugar with other foods. I also get ridiculous migraines from caffeine, so I stay far, far away from it in all forms.

Sweet Nothings said...

I had a FULL ON sugar crash sunday afternoon..my mom had no sympahthy..direct quote "danielle, you're 24..have you no control"

apparently, not.

PS~Erin said...

Well, it certainly affects my daughter... She gets noticably sillier after having candy, and then she gets grumpy after that.

I've heard the myth and I dispell it! I'm sure it affects different people in different ways, but I'm not buying the no effect story. And yes, I agree, that they should have used a better test set up, with the placebo being no sugar.

LiLu said...

Thank goodness I prefer salt to sugar. It'd just be one more way for me to have made a fool of myself. ;-)

Kathy Laraway Decker said...

Anyone who has worked at a school around Halloween or Christmas knows that "sugar high" is not a myth! It's worse than full-moon at the nursing home.

Anonymous said...

Did you now that other cultures do not really have the 'myth' that children get frantic due to sugar intake? I come from Spain and, well, maybe some people have noticed this altered behavior, but there is not really any cultural belief on that (or at least there wasn't...TV and films do really have an impact on culture, I don't know)